<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Mag Sensor Specs?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Your Data sheets show different figures for the Mag sensor in the RI and ZA part.<br />
RI suggests +/- 400,000nT and 30nT resolution (my guess perhaps 15/16bit ADC)<br />
ZA suggests +/-800,000nT and 500nT resolution (My guess perhaps 12 bit ADC)</p>
<p><img src="http://navview.blob.core.windows.net/forum/upload/d62936dc-329c-437a-898f-878625aa0cf4-image-k2y4aakd.png" alt="d62936dc-329c-437a-898f-878625aa0cf4-image.png" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /></p>
<p><img src="http://navview.blob.core.windows.net/forum/upload/66b1e325-cc48-4069-a773-4ba89eadd02f-image-k2y4cegc.png" alt="66b1e325-cc48-4069-a773-4ba89eadd02f-image.png" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /></p>
<p>Is this correct (That the ZI has better resolution) - or does that represent 'old' hardware designs?</p>
<p>I'm interested in the raw performance of the Mag sensor - as I would like to make use of the mag data separately, in addition to the solution for attitude. (I will probably not use the Mag as part of the attitude computation)</p>
<p>Is it possible for you give me some kind of  indication of Mag X/Y/Z zero offsets, and relative scale errors, (and maybe orthogonality of axes?).</p>
<p>R</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//topic/100/mag-sensor-specs</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 23:33:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.aceinna.com//topic/100.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 03:13:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mag Sensor Specs? on Thu, 14 Nov 2019 03:13:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Your Data sheets show different figures for the Mag sensor in the RI and ZA part.<br />
RI suggests +/- 400,000nT and 30nT resolution (my guess perhaps 15/16bit ADC)<br />
ZA suggests +/-800,000nT and 500nT resolution (My guess perhaps 12 bit ADC)</p>
<p><img src="http://navview.blob.core.windows.net/forum/upload/d62936dc-329c-437a-898f-878625aa0cf4-image-k2y4aakd.png" alt="d62936dc-329c-437a-898f-878625aa0cf4-image.png" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /></p>
<p><img src="http://navview.blob.core.windows.net/forum/upload/66b1e325-cc48-4069-a773-4ba89eadd02f-image-k2y4cegc.png" alt="66b1e325-cc48-4069-a773-4ba89eadd02f-image.png" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /></p>
<p>Is this correct (That the ZI has better resolution) - or does that represent 'old' hardware designs?</p>
<p>I'm interested in the raw performance of the Mag sensor - as I would like to make use of the mag data separately, in addition to the solution for attitude. (I will probably not use the Mag as part of the attitude computation)</p>
<p>Is it possible for you give me some kind of  indication of Mag X/Y/Z zero offsets, and relative scale errors, (and maybe orthogonality of axes?).</p>
<p>R</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/408</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/408</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 03:13:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mag Sensor Specs? on Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:18:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://forum.aceinna.com//uid/197">@Richard</a><br />
Thank-you for pointing out this inconsistency in the two datasheets. Both products use the same 3D Magnetic sensor and same processor. I am checking with R&amp;D to define what the specification should be. We will ECO datahsheet(s) to make them correct. I do know the underlying Mag Sensor chip is +/- 8 Gauss. Please send an email to <a href="mailto:jfennelly@aceinna.com" rel="nofollow">jfennelly@aceinna.com</a>. Once I get it I can send you the datasheet for the 3D magnetic sensor we are using in the products.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/417</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/417</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fennelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:18:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mag Sensor Specs? on Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:33:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Magnetometer specification are:<br />
Range = +/- 8 Gauss<br />
Resolution = 0.25 mGauss<br />
I do not have an orthogonality specification. I suspect it is quite good.  I do have a typical transverse sensitivity specification of  +/- 2%.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fennelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:33:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>