<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Post processing with tightly coupled GNSS+Base Station+IMU]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I am from the surveying and mapping community and focusing on the accuracy rather than realtime applications.<br />
The golden standard is to use tightly coupled GNSS+Base Station+IMU for the estimation of position and angles, i.e. Inertial Explorer or POSPAC UAV/MMS.</p>
<p>I would like to ask if this is also supported for OpenRTK or INS100?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Han</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//topic/300/post-processing-with-tightly-coupled-gnss-base-station-imu</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:52:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.aceinna.com//topic/300.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2021 01:32:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Post processing with tightly coupled GNSS+Base Station+IMU on Sun, 08 Aug 2021 01:32:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I am from the surveying and mapping community and focusing on the accuracy rather than realtime applications.<br />
The golden standard is to use tightly coupled GNSS+Base Station+IMU for the estimation of position and angles, i.e. Inertial Explorer or POSPAC UAV/MMS.</p>
<p>I would like to ask if this is also supported for OpenRTK or INS100?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Han</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/1259</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/1259</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Han Hu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2021 01:32:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Post processing with tightly coupled GNSS+Base Station+IMU on Tue, 10 Aug 2021 04:16:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://forum.aceinna.com//uid/1221">@Han-Hu</a> I am sorry ,but our data format is different from what you said.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/1260</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/1260</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zrs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 04:16:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Post processing with tightly coupled GNSS+Base Station+IMU on Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:15:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://forum.aceinna.com//uid/1008">@zrs</a> A related question. Does INS1000 support this kind of processing (using Inertial Explorer for post processing).<br />
I have seen from the docs saying<br />
<code>... The system can also record all tracked dual frequency multi-constellation measurements for post-processing...</code><br />
Is the <code>post-processing</code> the same thing?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/1261</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/1261</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Han Hu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:15:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>