<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[MTLT305D dynamic accuracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Is it possible to get 0.1 degree dynamic accuracy with the MTLT305D?<br />
Thanks,<br />
JayantD</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//topic/60/mtlt305d-dynamic-accuracy</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 01:56:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.aceinna.com//topic/60.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:14:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to MTLT305D dynamic accuracy on Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:14:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Is it possible to get 0.1 degree dynamic accuracy with the MTLT305D?<br />
Thanks,<br />
JayantD</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/194</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/194</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JayantD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:14:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to MTLT305D dynamic accuracy on Mon, 12 Aug 2019 00:45:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi JayantD,</p>
<p>That depends on the dynamic profile and measurement range of your application. However, 0.1deg is a pretty high accuracy. If you further consider the temperatur range, it is quite chanllenging. In our spec, the static angle accuracy of the full temperature range (-40C to 85C) is 0.15deg.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.aceinna.com//post/195</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.aceinna.com//post/195</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dong xiaoguang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 00:45:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>